Odyssey An Epic Hero with a Flaw Essay Example

Odyssey: An Epic Hero with a Flaw Paper Odyssey: An Epic Hero with a Flaw BY cilia85 An Epic Hero With a Flaw In one of Homers most ancient Greek epics The Odyssey, Odysseus is clearly defined as an epic hero. Although having no superpowers like the Gods, Odysseus is portrayed as brave, loyal and having cunning intelligence throughout his Journey home following the fall of Troy. During his return back to Ithaca, Odysseus is faced with many challenges which derail him from his nostos / homecoming. Yet, these obstacles are not only because of the wrath of the Gods, but also due to the onsequences of Odysseus mortal flaws and weaknesses. Although smart and decisive, Odysseus suffers because of his excessive pride. Stranded in a gigantic cave with Polyphemus the one-eyed Cyclops by his side, the wise Odysseus devises a very strategic plan. As they both sipped the dark wine from their ivy-wooded bowls, the Cyclops asks Odysseus for his name. By this time, the wine had already started to affect the Cyclops perception. Odysseus answered wittingly: My name is No-one. No-ones the name they have called me my mother, my father and all the rest of my ar-friends. (McCrorie 128) Displaying his God like powers, he escapes the cave by courageously blinding Polyphemus. The Cyclops lets out a maddened call for help as he moaned in pain. When the other Cyclops heard him writhing with pain, they inquired. But fooled by the intelligent Odysseus, Polyphemus responds: My friends, No-one kills me through cunning, hardy by great strength. (McCrorie 129) Odysseus finally escapes but undermines his entire plan because of his excessive pri de. We will write a custom essay sample on Odyssey: An Epic Hero with a Flaw specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Odyssey: An Epic Hero with a Flaw specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Odyssey: An Epic Hero with a Flaw specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer As he escapes, he foolishly reveals his identity while taunting the giant by exclaiming: If nyone bound for the death-world should come by, asking about your shameful loss of your eyesight, tell them Odysseus blinded you, looter of cities, the son of Laertes, his home on Ithaka Island. (McCrorie 132) By boasting and revealing his identity, Odysseus shows his lack of foresight and by consequence becomes the barer of Poseidons wrath throughout his return to Ithaca. After defeating Polyphemus, Odysseus feels glorious because of his victory. He wants to make sure that people know that he was the one who blinded Polyphemus. But this sense of pride becomes detrimental to his goals and causes Odysseus to suffer grave consequences. One of Poseidons rages is seen as Odysseus sailed to Phaiakia. As he sailed on his raft, the anger of the sea becomes apparent as Poseidon the Earth Shaker gathers clouds, roughs the seas and gathers huge waves. The storm mounts as a giant wave struck him down from its fearsome crest when hed spoken. It twirled his raft in the water and threw him far from the craft, making the steer-oar drop from his hand. The mast as cracked in the middle by frightfully shifting winds that came at it gale-force. The man went under a long time, unable to bob up swiftly from under the drive and fall of the huge wave. (McCrorie 75) The great storm totally deteriorates Odysseus spirit. A tired and suffering Odysseus finds himself hoping to slip away from his own death. Throughout his Journey, the Gods favored Odysseus during his trials and tribulations. Often helped and guided by Athena, our epic hero faced many complex challenges during his battle towards redemption. However, his greatly delayed and derailed return home was not only because of Poseidon who held a grudge against him for blinding his son but also due to his character flaw. His excessive pride compromised his homecoming showing Odysseus imperfect human side. His lack of foresight made him believe that the height of glory is achieved by spreading your name when you achieve something. But at the end, he suffers grave consequences because of his foolish actions. Bibliography McCrorie, Edward. Homer: The Odyssey. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004.

Juan in this novel represents the quintessential saint and martyr Essay Example

Juan in this novel represents the quintessential saint and martyr Essay Example Juan in this novel represents the quintessential saint and martyr Essay Juan in this novel represents the quintessential saint and martyr Essay Essay Topic: Fight Club Novel In The Power and the Glory, Greene presents us with a very unconventional protagonist: a fugitive whisky priest, the father of a bastard child, on the run from an overzealous lieutenant in a world where religion is illegal. Struggling to survive, he meets a scheming Mestizo, a Judas, who he knowingly follows into the hands of the lieutenant, and is subsequently executed. The novel examines the concepts of duty, persecution, compassion, and the idea of sainthood. The world of Mexico that Greene creates is a decaying, merciless, ungodly place, a place where one would not necessarily expect to find a typical saint. The storybook heroic saint in the novel, Juan, embodies all of the saintly stereotypes, whereas the priest does not. Greene is not interested in the typical, formulaic saint: he is far more concerned with the idea of finding spirituality in unexpected places, a good example of which is the prison scene.The prison scene is presented by Greene as being a microcosm of the world: This place was very like the world: overcrowded with lust and crime and unhappy love, it stank to heaven. This shows us Greenes acceptance of the world, overcrowded with inevitable human flaws, with the repetition of and increasing the pace of reading, giving a tone of relentlessness. The word crime linking the prison and the outside world implies that, just as the prison is full of criminals, so too is the world. Lust is a reference to the pair copulating in the prison, and the wider implication of this is that the world is full of such lust, which Greene accepts, as we are but humans. Indeed, the priest himself succumbed to lust, in conceiving Brigitta, his illegitimate daughter. Unhappy love in itself is an interesting binary pair, as one usually associates love with happiness; Greene is here subverting our expectations associated with the word love, perhaps suggesting that the archetypal connotations of love are often illusory.The priests time in prison also gives us an insight into his own views on martyrdom; when a prisoner suggests he is a martyr, he replies I dont think martyrs are like this Martyrs are holy men. The fact that he giggles first shows us that hes no Juan; giggling is a childish, unmanly thing to do. This shows us that he does not believe himself to be a holy man; he is in a state of mortal sin. This is because he has fathered a bastard child, which fills him with a miserable happiness, reminiscent of the unhappy love in the prison. He continues his self-deprecation, saying you must never think the holy martyrs are like me. I am a whisky priest. His repeated use of the word holy, and his dissociation from it, shows that the priest is humble, modest, and aware that he is not the typical holy man. The fact that he accepts the whisky priest label, whilst avoiding the label of martyr shows that he is modest, but also encourages the reader to question the nature of martyrdom; could a whisky priest also be a martyr?A martyr, or saint, in the p riests eyes should see beauty in suffering: Saints talk about the beauty of suffering. Well, we are not saints, you and I. This is regarding the people having sex in the prison, when he is discussing it with the pious woman. He says he is a bad priest and knows from experience how much beauty Satan carried. That he acknowledges beauty in sin goes against traditional Catholic ideals regarding sin; he has a more realistic attitude to life, discarding the idealistic view of sin as being ugly, accepting that it can be beautiful. Of course, Greene is subtly implying that the priest does possess saintly qualities, in that he knows what a saint should see. Indeed, even though he doesnt find beauty in suffering here, he finds peace, clarity and an irrational affection for the inhabitants of the prison: love.Love is something the priest values highly, and in the religious sense love is paramount. It is notable that in his innocence, he had felt no love for anyone; now in his corruption he h ad learnt Here, Greene shows us that the priests previous, pious, innocent way of life had been devoid of true love. Now, through suffering and corruption, he learns love, giving him a somewhat saintly quality. Typically, saints should learn through suffering alone, not corruption; but we know that the priest is no typical saint. Indeed, presenting us with a priest whose love stems from corruption questions the traditional nature of sainthood as epitomised by Juan.The way that the novel is written encourages the reader to sympathise with the whisky priest, in spite of his flaws. The priest shuffles in and out of scenes, with an air of nervous hilarity. He is diminutive, lacks presence, and refers to himself as a bad priest. This is in stark contrast with Juan, who was noted for his humility and piety; but yet, even the pious Catholic mother who is reading the story of Juan admits that the whisky priest is not despicable. The same cannot be said for Josà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½, though, whom she does refer to as being a despicable man.Josà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ represents cowardice, abandonment of faith, and selfishness. In the graveyard, he refuses to pray for a couples dead child, confessing I am unworthy. Cant you see? I am a coward. This aspect of Josà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ is made clear on numerous occasions, and his life seems to be dictated by fear. The word coward rings true, as Josà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½, unlike the whisky priest, gave in to public humiliation, marriage, in order to save himself. He is described by Greene as having given in to the unforgivable sin despair. Contrastingly, the whisky priest never yields to despair, and has an underlying moral code and sense of duty he puts his duty before his fear, unlike Josà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½. It is no coincidence, then, that the priest who converted Greene to Catholicism, Father Trollope, was described by Greene in A Sort of Life, as driven further by some inner compulsion to the priesthood; it is clear to see that the whisky priest reflects this com pulsion Greene writes that the whisky priest had given into despair five years ago, when he conceived his child, and he returns to the scene of his despair with a curious lightening of the heart. For he had got over despair too. This is crucial, as it is the pivotal difference between him and Josà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½; Josà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ is unable to get over despair.Despair is a common theme in the novel, which is unsurprising given the setting. The Mexico Greene describes is one with blazing Mexican sun and bleaching dust. The words blazing and bleaching are very negative; blazing conjures up imagery of fire, and bleaching carries connotations of bones and arid land. Greene uses a filmic narrative technique, describing the visual aspects of the novel in detail; as Evelyn Waugh writes, His technical mastery has never been better manifested in his statement of the scene It is the cameras eye recording significant detail. It is this which gives the reader a clearer image of just how bleak the set ting is to live in.Living in such a place, despair seems almost inevitable for most, which creates a need for escapism. The story of Juan provides such escapism for the girls who listen intently to it: One of the little girls licked her lips secretively. This was life. Obviously, the story of Juan is not life at all; Greene is being ironic here, as the idealistic world of the tale is far removed from the harsh realities of life. It is also ironic that the mother says Juan was a true young Mexican boy, as children in this novel are typically cynical (such as Coral Fellows, Brigitta, and Luis, the boy who idolises the lieutenant), or in the case of the girls, gullible. These harsh realities outline the absurdities of Juans clearly fictitious world, and highlight the sheer dreadfulness of the world Greene has set the novel in, a world in which the word life was taboo: it reminded you of death. By telling the audience that the people of this place associate the word life only with death , Greene is emphasising the bleakness of the world, and the nihilistic attitudes of many that live there. In such a world, a heroic such as Juan seems ill-fitting and unrealistic: the whisky priest is a flawed, corrupted hero, for a flawed, corrupted world.This flawed hero, however, was not well-received by all of Greenes contemporaries; George Orwell wrote that Greene appears to share the idea, which has been floating around ever since Baudelaire, that there is something rather distinguà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ in being damned; Hell is a sort of high-class nightclub, entry to which is reserved for Catholics only. Here, Orwell is trivialising the novel; the word floating is rather condescending, and the use of distinguà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ seems rather dismissive, and implies that the idea is somewhat pretentious. Mention of a nightclub further trivialises the novels message. Orwell is clearly accusing Greene of being unoriginal and pretentious, and the whisky priest as being nothing new. However, I disa gree; with the direct comparisons to sainthood and martyrdom between Juan and the priest, Greene puts this idea into a newer, more realistic and contemporary context.The world in which the novel takes place is one of people who doubt the priest: That is what everyone says all the time you do no good I can see them saying it all over the world. The fact that the priest is told this all the time shows that the opposition he faces is relentless, but he still does not give into despair. You do no good shows that his work is viewed as futile by the population. This is reminiscent of the nihilistic view expressed by philosopher Aleister Crowley in Towards The Golden Dawn, being appalled by the futility of all human endeavour. However, instead of being appalled by this futility, the priest acts in spite of it this is where his strength lies.Whilst nihilistic attitudes permeate many layers of this Mexican society, the priest seems to be determined, strong and stoic in his outlook,. He kno ws that his efforts are futile, that the easiest thing to do would be to hand himself in yet carries on regardless. He shows faith and courage, defies despair, and struggles on. Indeed, when he visits his home village, he realises that When he was gone it would be as if God in all this space ceased to exist, and finds himself shaken with the enormity of the problem, but still continues on regardless, driven by a sense of duty. That God would effectively cease to exist in the area without the priest outlines the magnitude of his responsibility: an immense load of responsibility: it was indistinguishable from love. This love is very like the love he feels for his fellow inmates in the prison scene.In the prison scene, the priest describes saints as people who see beauty in suffering, but doesnt see himself as such a saint. However, he certainly has a saintly appreciation of suffering. An excellent example of this is when he is about to leave his home town: He cried out stubbornly in a voice of authority, That is why I tell you that heaven is here: this is a part of heaven just as pain is a part of pleasure. He said, Pray that you will suffer more and more and more. Never get tired of suffering. The fact that he is stubborn shows how resilient and determined he is, and again gives us the idea that he is defiant in the face of despair. In his modesty, he proclaims himself not [a] saint in prison, yet clearly does appreciate the beauty in suffering. He links suffering to heaven, clearly associated with beauty, and his repetition of the word suffering shows us how passionate he is on the subject. It seems Greene is deliberately making the audience aware of the priests stance on suffering, so that we remember this moment when he later talks about sainthood in the prison. This is a technique Greene uses effectively, as we see the priest as humble and modest, yet still sees the world as a saint by his own definition; seeing beauty in suffering.The priest is in many wa ys a pathetic character, with his shambling from place to place, and his degradation. He is, in many situations, a powerless victim of circumstance. For example, when the wine he works so hard to purchase is drunk by the chief of police, he starts crying, and says he sees all the hope of the world draining away. Here, we see the pathetic side of the priest not only because he is crying, but because he is beginning to despair, and is a powerless victim of circumstance. However, this is by no means his most pathetic, undignified moment; this is without doubt when he fights with a dog over a scrap of meat. The absurdity of the situation is not lost on the priest, either: suddenly he laughed: this was human dignity disputing with a bitch over a bone. The phrase human dignity is clearly intended by Greene to be ironic, as the priest has lost any dignity he may have once had by fighting with the crippled bitch over a bone. He is clearly not a macho, true Mexican [man], unlike Juan Greene gives us such situations to show that humans Gods image will do what is necessary to survive, which should not affect their role as saints. He challenges the traditional view of sainthood, where upholding ones dignity is expected.A sense of responsibility clearly drives the priest to continue his struggle, his suffering; he knowingly walks into the mestizos trap He was quite certain that this was a trap probably the half-caste had suggested it but it was a fact that the American was there, dying. This fact gives the priest a sense of responsibility, even though hes heading to his death, which displays immense courage. Interestingly, the priest fails to see his own worth in this regard; after coming across the Native American woman, he thought God forgive me. I have no sense of responsibility: what can you expect of a whisky priest?.Greene makes it clear to the reader, by examples such as missing the boat at the start and following Judas into the trap at the end, that the pries t does have a sense of responsibility, despite being a whisky priest; this defies the stereotypes one might associate with the term, and shows that the priest has determination and courage. Of course, the priest is not completely courageous; he fears pain, and still fears death hes only human, unlike the seemingly supernatural Juan; he thinks you needed to be a little drunk to die, showing his flaws of alcoholism and fear. Juan, of course, was quite calm and happy when he knew he was about to die, and prayed for his enemies.Praying for his enemies, however, is something that the priest does, to an extent, share with Juan he pities the mestizo, thinking it was really shocking bad luck for the poor devil that he was to be burdened with a sin of such magnitude. Indeed, in his cell, the priest tries to pray for the half-caste, the lieutenant but in the moment of prayer he switched back to his child beside the rubbish dump, and he knew it was for her only that he prayed. The fact that he is unable to do as Juan and pray for his enemies is largely unimportant, as he at least attempts to pray for his enemies, and it is a sign of his flaws that he can think only of his daughter. He himself thinks that the people deserved a saint [but] God hadnt thought fit to send them one. Just by saying this, Greene is encouraging the reader to compare the priest to a saint, and is clearly challenging the preconceptions regarding sainthood.The priest, before death, thinks it would have been quite easy to have been a saint. It would only have needed a little self-restraint and a little courage. Here, Greene uses the word little twice, to show how the priest, by his own measure, has only missed sainthood by a small way. This encourages the reader to view the priest as a saint, and dismiss his sins as being too little, too trivial, to mar his piety. The mother of Luis even says that the whisky priest was a hero, one of the martyrs of the Church, and may be one of the saints. That eve n she considers him to be as such conveys Greenes message that sainthood need not be restricted to the absolutely, unattainably perfect. However, Greene seems to almost mock established ideas of sainthood when the mother says Of course, before we know he is a saint, there will have to be miracles and goes on to mention paying for relics. Such concepts seem ludicrous, given the priests own pragmatism, yet still persist. Greene is here questioning the Catholic definition of sainthood, and is satirising it critically.Critic David Lodge wrote that There is a good deal of evidence, internal and external, that in Greenes fiction Catholicism is not a body of belief requiring exposition and demanding categorical assent or dissent, but a system of concepts, a source of situations, and a reservoir of symbols. Clearly, he is supporting the notion that Greene challenges the categorical assent and dissent regarding sainthood, where assent represents the followings of the Catholic teachings, many of which the priest abandons. The assent is embodied by Juan, and the complete dissent by Josà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½, giving into the ultimate sin, despair. The priest lies in the middle ground, representing what V.S. Pritchett refers to as a whole and memorable human being.In conclusion, Greene uses the contrast between Juan and the whisky priest to not only question, but also to criticise and challenge the idealistic Catholic views on sainthood. He uses the priests flaws and self-doubt to present us with a character who would not be considered a traditional saint, but possesses many saintly qualities. Greene gives us the priests ideas of sainthood, such as seeing beauty in suffering and having a sense of responsibility, with the priests own thoughts of how he is not fulfilling them. However, Greene subtly subverts this by having sections in the novel where the priest does fulfil these self-lain expectations of sainthood, allowing the reader to make the connection and realise that the priest is actually a very dedicated and dutiful Christian, even though he himself does not realise it; his humility serves only to augment his saintliness.

Review of Accounting Ethics Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Review of Accounting Ethics - Research Paper Example Accounting ethics is a vast term and have a lot of minor details in it. Looking at just the basics, it can be defined as providing right financial details to the company and to its stake holders. Numbers are something which can be manipulated very easily for one’s own interest and that is where the rules and regulations are made to make sure that the accounting ethics are not breached at any level. Businesses make sure that each and every account is made and maintained in the right manner (Cohn, 2013). Accountants work in many different areas and fields. They are not focused on one particular subject but have to handle a lot of work at a single time. The accounting areas majorly include performing audits, making tax statements, making budgets and planning for the future, manage the ongoing accounts, consultancy and of course, preparing general accounts. Having so many things to handle, there is an opportunity for them to make frauds at each level or subjects they are working o n. The greed of making huge amount of money in no time makes them get onto the wrong track and that’s where the ethical issues start coming into action (Mele Carne, 2005). Although having all the right code of conduct, there are still some loopholes in the system which the accountants and the senior officials of the company identify and then use it for their own good. One of the biggest examples we can find in the history which was charged of the allegation of breach of accounting ethics is the Lehmon Brothers Inc. Lehmon Brothers was one of the giant companies and had a big name when it comes to the investment market of the United States of America and due to its unethical accounting methods it got bankrupt. The business of Lehmon Brothers can be described as borrowing money from the general public and then investing that money into different assets. They earned interest from their investment into the assets and then share the interest earned with the people they borrowed lo an from (Jeffers, 2011). Lehmon Brothers were considered a good company to invest in as they showed people their artificially made financial statements to the people. After they filed bankruptcy in 2008, the position of Lehmon Brothers came in front of the eyes of the people. We will now discuss about how they betrayed people by showing artificially made good financial statements. A report was made by Jeffers, Agatha E. in which all the details regarding Lehmon Brothers bankruptcy and how they did breach the accounting ethics was presented. Lehmon Brothers used a Repo 105 accounting policy to misguide their investors. Repo 105 policy suggests that when an asset is given out and cash is received, it should be recorded as sale of asset. Although in accounting methods, an asset is not considered and written as sale until it is completely transferred to the second party and is fully non-operational by the company. Lehmon Brothers accustomed to give assets as a guarantee to purchase loan s from the institutions abroad. They recorded this transaction as sale of assets and showed people that they have got rid of non worthy assets and have earned good money from that. In this way their balance sheet looked less leveraged as they have less unproductive assets and more cash. Secondly they used to pay off some liabilities with the

Black water private military company Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Black water private military company - Essay Example Such private military firms refer to their line of business as The Circuit or private military industry in an effort of avoiding the stigma of being associated with mercenaries often. In the armed conflict history, hiring of mercenaries to carry out some military operations has been a common practice. The expertise and services offered by the PMCs are basically similar to the ones of police forces or governmental military, but most often occurs on smaller scale. While the PMCs often offer services to supplement and train official armed forces in governmental services, they can also be utilized in provision of bodyguards by the private firms for key staff or even protection of the premises of companies, particularly in hostile prone areas. However, the contractors who employ offensive mode of force in war zones could be viewed as unlawful or illegal combatants, with reference to a Geneva Conventions’ concept outline as well as explicitly specified by US Military Commissions Act (Barnes 32-35). Nation-states are hiring the private military firms in increasing rates to act in areas marred by armed conflicts. The predominant feeling within international community is that regulation of such companies is quite imperative. The present Congress has grappled with a variety of issues concerning the utilization of the private contractors in provision of security for individuals as well as property in Iraq and other conflict prone areas. This has seen the US gradually increasing the kinds of roles and tasks contracted to the private firms in military operations. Generally, the US Congress has accepted the use of the unarmed private contractors’ concept to conduct support functions in the military operations like provision of laundry and food services. However, this has posed a different challenge concerning the contracts’ costs and the alleged cases of favoritism in the issuance of these services (Elsea, Schwartz & Nakamura 5). Some of the emergent armed non-state

Cathys Clothing case study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Cathys Clothing case study - Essay Example onus provisions for the Coastal District stores, I will evaluate whether the stores have met their set targets in order to earn the stipulated bonuses (Armstrong, 2007). Evidently, New Haven and Boston have surpassed their benchmarks. For the month of May, New Haven Store has registered sales of $628,000 against the required $570,000 hence automatically qualified for the bonus. Concurrently, for Boston, the 12% of $549,500 (sales) is $ 65,940 (net income goal required for the month). Fortunately, the store the store registered a net income of $110,943. It surpassed the target thus qualified for the bonus. Another financial factor I would consider in evaluating the proposed bonus plans for Boston and New Haven incorporates the overall performance against expenditure. It is evident that the expenditure in advertising for Boston and New Haven stores are$5,300 and $53,000 respectively for the month of May. This contradicts the ultimate net income, which is $110,943 for Boston Stores and $70,992 for New Haven Store. I consider such differences and reward any store that spends strategically and sparingly on their daily business operations. Financially, this indicates some sense of responsibility and obedience for the business (Crosson & Needles, 2010). The managers in the performing stores should get some bonuses besides the stipulated ones. The aspects of cost and revenues are critical in the realms of bonus implementation. Strategic considerations will include customer care and prompt services. I will consider the stores in the realms of their customer attraction endeavors and how they uphold the brand name of Cathy’s Classic Clothes. This will be proportional to the value of sales registered per store. This will affect even the Portland Stores, which is not under the scheme. I consider such factors to be influential in decision-making, fair compensation, and motivation of all store managers (Warren, Reeve & Duchac, 2011). I expect the proposed bonus structures to

Leadership Theories From Mahatma Gandhi To Winston Management Essay

Leadership Theories From Mahatma Gandhi To Winston Management Essay From Mahatma Gandhi to Winston Churchill to Martin Luther King, there are as many leadership styles as there are leaders. Fortunately, businesspeople and psychologists have developed useful and simple ways to describe the main styles of leadership, and these can help aspiring leaders understand which styles they should use. So, whether you manage a team at work, captain a sports team, or lead a major corporation, which approach is best? Consciously, or subconsciously, youll probably use some of the leadership styles in this article at some point. Understanding these styles and their impact can help you develop your own, personal leadership style and help you become a more effective leader. With this in mind, there are many different frameworks that have shaped our current understanding of leadership, and many of these have their place, just as long as theyre used appropriately. This article looks at some of the most common frameworks, and then looks at popular styles of leadership. Leadership Theories Researchers have developed a number of leadership theories over the years. These fall into four main groups: 1. Behavioral theories What does a good leader do? Behavioral theories focus on how leaders behave. Do they dictate what needs to be done and expect cooperation? Or do they involve the team in decisions to encourage acceptance and support? In the 1930s, Kurt Lewin developed a leadership framework based on a leaders decision-making behavior. Lewin argued that there are three types of leaders: Autocratic leaders make decisions without consulting their teams. This is considered appropriate when decisions genuinely need to be taken quickly, when theres no need for input, and when team agreement isnt necessary for a successful outcome. Democratic leaders allow the team to provide input before making a decision, although the degree of input can vary from leader to leader. This type of style is important when team agreement matters, but it can be quite difficult to manage when there are lots of different perspectives and ideas. Laissez-faire leaders dont interfere; they allow people within the team to make many of the decisions. This works well when the team is highly capable and motivated, and when it doesnt need close monitoring or supervision. However, this style can arise because the leader is lazy or distracted, and, here, this approach can fail. Similar to Lewins model, the Blake-Mouton Managerial Grid helps you decide how best to lead, depending on your concern for people versus your concern for production. The model describes five different leadership styles: impoverished, country club, team leader, produce or perish, or middle of the road. The descriptions of these will help you understand your own leadership habits and adapt them to meet your teams needs. Clearly, then, how leaders behave impacts on their effectiveness. Researchers have realized, though, that many of these leadership behaviors are appropriate at different times. So, the best leaders are those who can use many different behavioral styles and use the right style for each situation. 2. Contingency theories How does the situation influence good leadership? The realization that there isnt one correct type of leader led to theories that the best leadership style is contingent on, or depends on, the situation. These theories try to predict which leadership style is best in which circumstance. When a decision is needed fast, which style is preferred? When the leader needs the full support of the team, is there a better way to lead? Should a leader be more people oriented or task oriented? These are all examples of questions that contingency leadership theories try to address. A popular contingency-based framework is the Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory, which links leadership style with the maturity of individual members of the leaders team. 3. Trait theories What type of person makes a good leader? Trait theories argue that leaders share a number of common personality traits and characteristics, and that leadership emerges from these traits. Early trait theories promoted the idea that leadership is an innate, instinctive quality that you either have or dont have. Thankfully, weve moved on from this approach, and were learning more about what we can do as individuals to develop leadership qualities within ourselves and others. Whats more, traits are external behaviors that emerge from things going on within the leaders mind and its these internal beliefs and processes that are important for effective leadership. Trait theory does, however, help us identify some qualities that are helpful when leading others and, together, these emerge as a generalized leadership style. Examples include empathy, assertiveness, good decision-making, and likability. In our article Building TomorrowHYPERLINK http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_62.htmHYPERLINK http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_62.htms Leaders, we discuss a series of attributes that are important for all types of leaders to develop. However, none of these traits, nor any combination of them, will guarantee success as a leader. You need more than that. 4. Power and influence theories What is the source of the leaders power? Power and influence theories of leadership take an entirely different approach. Theyre based on the different ways in which leaders use power and influence to get things done, and the leadership styles that emerge as a result. Perhaps the most well known of these theories is French and RavenHYPERLINK http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_56.htmHYPERLINK http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_56.htms Five Forms of Power. This model distinguishes between using your position to exert power, and using your personal attributes to be powerful. French and Raven identified three types of positional power legitimate, reward, and coercive and two sources of personal power expert and referent (your personal appeal and charm). The model suggests that using personal power is the better alternative and, because Expert Power (the power that comes with being a real expert in the job) is the most legitimate of these, that you should actively work on building this. Similarly, leading by example is another highly effective way to establish and sustain a positive influence with your team. Another valid leadership style thats supported by power and influence theories is Transactional Leadership. This approach assumes that work is done only because it is rewarded, and for no other reason, and it therefore focuses on designing tasks and reward structures. While it may not be the most appealing leadership strategy in terms of building relationships and developing a long-term motivating work environment, it does work, and its used in most organizations on a daily basis to get things done. An Up-to-Date Understanding of Leadership Within all of these theories, frameworks, and approaches to leadership, theres an underlying message that leaders need to have a variety of factors working in their favor. Effective leadership is not simply based on a set of attributes, behaviors, or influences. You must have a wide range of abilities and approaches that you can draw upon. Having said this, however, theres one leadership style that is appropriate in very many corporate situations that of Transformational Leadership. A leader using this style: Has integrity. Sets clear goals. Clearly communicates a vision. Sets a good example. Expects the best from the team. Encourages. Supports. Recognizes good work and people. Provides stimulating work. Helps people see beyond their self-interests and focus more on team interests and needs. Inspires. In short, transformational leaders are exceptionally motivating, and theyre trusted. When your team trusts you, and is really fired up by the way you lead, you can achieve great things! The transformational leadership style is the dominant leadership style taught in our How to Lead: Discover the Leader Within You program, although we do recommend that other styles are brought in as the situation demands. Having said that Transformational Leadership suits very many circumstances in business, we need to remember that there may be situations where its not the best style. This is why its worth knowing about the other styles shown below so that you have a greater chance of finding the right combination for the situation you find yourself in. Popular Leadership Styles A Glossary The leadership theories and styles discussed so far fit within formal theoretical frameworks. However, many more terms are used to describe leadership styles, even if these dont fit within a particular system. Its worth understanding these! 1. Autocratic leadership Autocratic leadership is an extreme form of transactional leadership, where leaders have absolute power over their workers or team. Staff and team members have little opportunity to make suggestions, even if these would be in the teams or the organizations best interest. Most people tend to resent being treated like this. Therefore, autocratic leadership often leads to high levels of absenteeism and staff turnover. However, for some routine and unskilled jobs, the style can remain effective because the advantages of control may outweigh the disadvantages. 2. Bureaucratic leadership Bureaucratic leaders work by the book. They follow rules rigorously, and ensure that their staff follows procedures precisely. This is a very appropriate style for work involving serious safety risks (such as working with machinery, with toxic substances, or at dangerous heights) or where large sums of money are involved (such as handling cash). 3. Charismatic leadership A charismatic leadership style can seem similar to transformational leadership, because these leaders inspire lots of enthusiasm in their teams and are very energetic in driving others forward. However, charismatic leaders can tend to believe more in themselves than in their teams, and this creates a risk that a project, or even an entire organization, might collapse if the leader leaves. In the eyes of the followers, success is directly connected to the presence of the charismatic leader. As such, charismatic leadership carries great responsibility, and it needs a long-term commitment from the leader. 4. Democratic leadership or participative leadership Although democratic leaders make the final decisions, they invite other members of the team to contribute to the decision-making process. This not only increases job satisfaction by involving team members, but it also helps to develop peoples skills. Team members feel in control of their own destiny, so theyre motivated to work hard by more than just a financial reward. Because participation takes time, this approach can take longer, but often the end result is better. The approach can be most suitable when working as a team is essential, and when quality is more important than speed to market, or productivity. 5. Laissez-faire leadership This French phrase means leave it be, and its used to describe leaders who leave their team members to work on their own. It can be effective if the leader monitors whats being achieved and communicates this back to the team regularly. Most often, laissez-faire leadership is effective when individual team members are very experienced and skilled self-starters. Unfortunately, this type of leadership can also occur when managers dont apply sufficient control. 6. People-oriented leadership or relations-oriented leadership This is the opposite of task-oriented leadership. With people-oriented leadership, leaders are totally focused on organizing, supporting, and developing the people in their teams. Its a participative style, and it tends to encourage good teamwork and creative collaboration. In practice, most leaders use both task-oriented and people-oriented styles of leadership. 7. Servant leadership This term, created by Robert Greenleaf in the 1970s, describes a leader who is often not formally recognized as such. When someone, at any level within an organization, leads simply by meeting the needs of the team, he or she is described as a servant leader. In many ways, servant leadership is a form of democratic leadership, because the whole team tends to be involved in decision making. Supporters of the servant leadership model suggest that its an important way to move ahead in a world where values are increasingly important, and where servant leaders achieve power on the basis of their values and ideals. Others believe that in competitive leadership situations, people who practice servant leadership can find themselves left behind by leaders using other leadership styles. 8. Task-Oriented leadership Highly task-oriented leaders focus only on getting the job done, and they can be quite autocratic. They actively define the work and the roles required, put structures in place, plan, organize, and monitor. However, because task-oriented leaders dont tend to think much about the well-being of their teams, this approach can suffer many of the flaws of autocratic leadership, with difficulties in motivating and retaining staff. 9. Transactional leadership This style of leadership starts with the idea that team members agree to obey their leader totally when they accept a job. The transaction is usually the organization paying the team members in return for their effort and compliance. The leader has a right to punish team members if their work doesnt meet the pre-determined standard. Team members can do little to improve their job satisfaction under transactional leadership. The leader could give team members some control of their income/reward by using incentives that encourage even higher standards or greater productivity. Alternatively, a transactional leader could practice management by exception rather than rewarding better work, the leader could take corrective action if the required standards are not met. Transactional leadership is really a type of management, not a true leadership style, because the focus is on short-term tasks. It has serious limitations for knowledge-based or creative work, however it can be effective in other situations. 10. Transformational leadership As we discussed earlier, people with this leadership style are true leaders who inspire their teams constantly with a shared vision of the future. While this leaders enthusiasm is often passed onto the team, he or she can need to be supported by detail people. Thats why, in many organizations, both transactional and transformational leadership are needed. The transactional leaders (or managers) ensure that routine work is done reliably, while the transformational leaders look after initiatives that add new value. Key Points While the transformational leadership approach is often highly effective, theres no one right way to lead or manage that fits all situations. To choose the most effective approach for yourself, consider the following: The skill levels and experience of your team. The work involved (routine, or new and creative). The organizational environment (stable or radically changing, conservative or adventurous). You own preferred or natural style. Good leaders often switch instinctively between styles, according to the people they lead and the work that needs to be done. Establish trust thats key to this process and remember to balance the needs of the organization against the needs of your team.

In the New Century, the Unfinished Business of the Old World :: essays research papers

In the New Century, the Unfinished Business of the Old   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  First of all I would like to restate that what keeps this world going is the infinite evolutionary progress, which evolves every human as well as the actions that each of us take throughout every second of our lives. Whenever, and wherever there is an action, there is a consequence that always follows closely. Sometimes it’s good but sometimes it can be bad, as well.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   What professor Galbraith says is that although we are so different in every aspect, we are also the same. Although we all want peace, not all of us act towards it. Money has always moved the world of egos, but nowadays it has reached a platform where much of the spiritual part of our lives has been overtaken by the material addiction of the human compulsion. The U.S is a living proof of it. Here, we live in extremes, you are either in, or you’re a totally out of the American societal acceptance. Either ways will make you a true American. But one thing bonds it together: the honesty and the quality of an organized personnel that runs this so loved and hated country. Although here Americans have all the facilities and support for sports and education, it always seems that there is something lacking. Other countries that unfortunately do not have the same blessings as Americans do eventually learn from their difficulties, creating something that in Portuguese, my native language, we call â€Å"Malicia†. This is a word deeply shows that humans are not robots and that we can adapt to everything in our own little ways. Malicia is something impossible to be taught. It is hidden inside each and everyone of us. What this article brings, in my understanding, is that it has come the time for the world to unite as one, and for everyone to start caring.

The Depiction of Lord Capulet in Romeo & Juliet

Set in the city of Verona during the 12th/13th century, Romeo and Juliet, is a typical love story by William Shakespeare with a tragedy twist. When Romeo Montague and his friends gate-crash Lord Capulet’s party, the last thing he imagined he would do is find the love of his life, Juliet. After realising Romeo is the son of her father’s sworn enemy they decide to keep their relationship secret and get married behind her families back. When Romeo’s best friend Mercutio is stabbed and killed by Juliet’s cousin Tybalt, Romeo kills Tybalt and is declared banished.Meanwhile, Juliet’s father, Lord Capulet, decides to cheer his daughter up by allowing her to marry Paris, though unknown to him, she is already married. Severely wanting to get out of this marriage and with her husband, Romeo, in a different town, Juliet seeks assistance from the priest, father Lawrence, who hands her a ‘poison’ which will mimic death for 24 hours, after her funera l she would be placed into a vault and when she awakes from her deep sleep her and Romeo would be able to run away to be together.Romeo is unaware of this plan as he is out when the messenger arrives so when his friend Balthasar learns of the death he immediately travels to tell Romeo. With Romeo thinking his love is dead he takes the risk of going back to Verona to say his final farewell to Juliet, when he arrives he is automatically spotted and the police, once Romeo had purchased poison he makes his way to the church.Soon enough, father Lawrence learns that Romeo has no idea Juliet is actually still alive. Inside the church Romeo drinks the poison which begins to kill him.. just as Juliet begins to wake, she realizes it’s too late and takes his gun to her head, Killing her instantly. Act 1 scene 1, we see several men from two families (the Capulet’s and the Montague’s) take part in a fight led by Tybalt, a Capulet and Juliet’s cousin, and Benvolio, Rom eo’s cousin and therefore a Montague.This is where we get the feel of absolute hatred between the two families. A loathing which has been passed down through generations, started between Lord Capulet, an overpowering and very controlling man and Lord Montague and equally powerful man. We are first introduced to Lord Capulet when he gets involved in a fight between Sampson, Gregory Benvolio and Tybalt. He is shown to be aggressive and confrontational because he says ‘What noise is this?Give me long sword ho! ’ as soon and he arrives. Which could indicate he doesn’t think about what he says and can be immature as well as how willing he is to get involved in the pointless feud, this is until Prince informs them ‘Once more, on pain of death, all men depart’ which implies if there is another street both Lord Capulet, Lord Montague and any other men involved will be executed, This is when Lord Capulet’s mood changes and he becomes calm.In Act 1 scene 2 Lord Capulet seems calm and willing to make peace with Lord Montague, we know this because he says ‘†¦ ‘tis not hard, I think for men so old as we to keep the peace. ’ ‘†¦ _we_ to keep the peace’ This shows he is trying to approach Lord Montague in an equal and friendly manor as he accepts there cannot be any more violent outbreaks in the streets anymore. We next see Lord Capulet in the Capulet household in the midst of a party when he is calmly talking to Paris about his daughter Juliet.Women in the Elizabethan age could refuse marriage but would be disowned by their families. In the beginning of Romeo and Juliet, Lord Capulet thinks Juliet is ‘too young’ and ‘still a stranger to the world’ . This is showing himself to be a very caring and loving father, this could be because he has no other children and could also be the reason he treats Tybalt like the son he never had. He refuses Prince the hand of hi s daughter because he doesn’t want to lose her yet, he goes on to change his mind later in the story.In the next scene Romeo Montague gatecrashes the Capulet’s party, Lord Capulet appears to be very respected by Tybalt because when Romeo is spotted and threatened by him, Lord Capulet looks at him and says â€Å"Content thee, Gentle coz, let him alone;† He goes on to say â€Å"Here in my house do him no disparagement; Therefore be patient, take no note of him; It is my will, the which if thou respect†.This is showing himself to be a fair man, treating his family and his enemy’s son the same and shows that he is clever, powerful and respected as he doesn’t want to make a scene in public and in front of his friends and family, Surprisingly Tybalt doesn’t go against his word at all, he listens and respects the wishes of his uncle. Shakespeare is showing this man to be kind and rational, we make a judgment at this stageon how he isnâ€℠¢t reacting to the fact Romeo is his the son of his arch-rival. In this scene Lord Capulet also compliments Romeo by calling him ‘A virtuous and well governed youth’ which shows how relaxed he is about the young Montague’s presence because we couldn’t imagine him complimenting an enemy in such a way. By the next point in the story, Tybalt and Mercutio are dead and we start to get an idea of what sort of a man Lord Capulet really is.In Act 3 Scene 4 he changes his mind and allows Prince to marry Juliet for a few reasons i. e. He wants her to be married and settled to a man he approves of, He wants to be proud of her, He wants her to be married to a man who has money, is generous, powerful and respected †¦ not knowing that she is already married to Romeo. After Tybalt is killed we know Juliet is devastated because she locks herself in her room, only letting Romeo in because he appears on her balcony, unbeknown to her father.We also know Tybalt’s death isn’t the only reason for her upset the other reason she is in such shock is the fact her ‘true love’, Romeo, is the reason for Tybalt’s death although her father doesn’t know , if he knew Romeo and Juliet were married she would be disowned by him and the rest of their family. Lord Capulet decides to bring the wedding forward in order to cheer her up, we know this because he says ‘She loved her kinsman Tybalt dearly’, He sees the wedding of his only child an opportunity to lift the mood after such death in the family.Unfortunately Juliet doesn’t want to marry Prince because she is in love with the now banished, Romeo. When Lady Capulet tells Juliet of her husband’s plans for her to be wed ‘early next Thursday morn’ she is surprised but refuses and tells her mother ‘When I do marry, I swear, It shall be Romeo, whom you know I hate, rather than Paris’ , We can tell from this sentence that she hasn’t told her mother of her relationship with Romeo and that her mother thinks Juliet hates Romeo for killing Tybalt.As Lord Capulet enters her room he immediately describes her body as a ‘fountain’ and says ’in one little body thou counterfeit’s a bark, a sea, a wind, For thy eyes, which I may call the sea, Do ebb and flow with tears. Thy bark thy body is, Sailing in this salt flood. Thy winds thy sighs†¦Ã¢â‚¬â„¢ Which shows us he is concerned about her and her wellbeing, showing him to be a caring father for a split-second. He is angered when he hears that she will not bemarrying Paris and disowns her straightaway, he says unforgivable things to her such as ‘Out, you green sickness, carrion! Out you baggage! You tallow face’ he also calls her a ‘Disobedient wretch’ He goes on to say ‘Get thee to church o’ Thursday, Or never after look me in the face’ , so he’s saying she either marries Pa ris or she’ll lose her father, She has to make the decision. There is a suggestion of physical violence when Lord Capulet exclaims ‘My fingers itch.’Implying he wants to hit her for disrespecting him by disagreeing with him. He reminds her of the importance of family and marrying to obtain a high status, we know this because he says ‘And having now provided A gentleman of A noble parentage, Of fair demesnes, youthful and nobly trained, stuffed as they say, with honorable parts’ he describes Paris in this way because he is trying to persuade Juliet to marry him, its as if he doesn’t want to disown her.Lord Capulet decides that she can ‘No longer house with me’ unless she marries Paris and he would rather see her beg, starve and die in the streets than live with her if she doesn’t go through with the marriage. Lord Capulet’s behavior in this scene shocks us because we are used to seeing him as a caring and loving fathe r towards Juliet and we don’t expect him to go this far when she refuses because he has seemed like a calm man in previous scenes. It’s sad to see his behavior change this dramatically towards her because a father should look out for his daughter.It’s also sad to see because it was his decision and she hasn’t had a choice in the matter at all and the feud between the Montague’s and Capulet’s was started between the two fathers so it isn’t Juliet’s fault and she should be able to see Romeo if she wants to. During the play, the language Lord Capulet uses to describe Juliet changes a lot. In the beginning of the play he describes her as ‘still a stranger to the world’ and ‘too young to marry’ which shows he is a caring father.He is looking out for his daughter and by saying she is too young to marry, he is trying to protect her from growing up too fast. His behavior towards her changes vastly when she ref uses to marry Paris possibly because he has spent time trying to protect her and now she throws it back in his face by disagreeing with him. Although Lord Capulet is unaware of the fact she is already married, she has just delayed being disowned by her father by keeping her marriage to Romeo a secret. We notice the change immediately  because one minute he’s describing her sadness and acting like he cares about her enough to be concerned about her happiness and then he change into a stubborn and, what seems like, a care-free father .We notice the change when he says ‘What is this? â€Å"Proud† and â€Å"I thank you† and â€Å"I thank you not† And yet not â€Å"proud†? Mistress minion you. ’ We don’t think he is capable of disowning his only child but he continues to call her ‘Baggage’ and ‘Green sickness’ which shows just how upset and angry he is with her.He uses harsh words by saying ‘An you b e mine, I’ll give you my friend. An you be not, Hang, beg, starve, die in the streets, For, my soul, I’ll ne’er acknowledge thee, Nor what is mine shall never do thee good’ saying he no longer will want anything to do with her if she doesn’t marry Paris and he would rather see her beg, starve and die on the streets rather than give her somewhere to live and he’ll never want anything to do with her, however if she agrees to marry Paris then he will forgive her for disagreeing and she can stay living there etc.Act 4 scene 5, When Juliet is found ‘dead’ in her bedroom , Lord Capulet appears to be grief-stricken and genuinely upset even though he had said he would disown her if she didn’t marry Paris. His sadness over rules his power in this scene as he turns to Lady Capulet and says ‘ O Heaven! O wife, Look how our daughter bleeds! ’ showing that he is so upset, he doesn’t care about how he appears to any one else. We realise he doesn’t see how he is partly responsible for her ‘death’ by forcing her into a marriage just to bring joy to himself, not in fact thinking at all about what Juliet would want.If he had realised this, we may be able to feel more sympathetic towards him as he would have probably been really upset and angry with himself which, in turn, could have saved his daughter’s life when she awoke. When she does awake to find Romeo had poisoned himself, oblivious to the fact Juliet wasn’t dead at all, she shoots herself in the head with his gun so as they can be together after all, even if that means in a different life.We notice that Lord Capulet realises the feud between the two families have been to blame for the two lovers’ deaths because he offers Lord Montague his hand and overall peace between the Montague’s and Capulet’s, Again showing the loving and caring fatherly side to himself. Throughout the entire play L ord Capulet’s mood varies between a loving, concerned father and an angry, heartless, powerful man. There are 4 main points in his behaviour.In the beginning he comes across as a powerful man when he takes part in a fight , his attitude in this scene is limited as he seems to be this man who is only interested in showing the Montague family who owns the city. When he engages in a conversation with Paris about marrying Juliet, he becomes more of a caring father and try’s to look out for her by saying she is ‘Too young’ to marry and although he says she is ‘still a stranger to him ´ which suggests that he has doubts about her loyalty to him and this also shows an absence of trust in her.The next main point is when he changes again to become an angry and somewhat cold man, we think this because he feels let down and his fears of loyalty towards him are true to an extent. He decides to disown her as a daughter unless she marries Paris because he feels let down and he obviously though he was doing right by her. He says he would rather see her beg and die on the streets than stay in that house, he calls her ‘baggage’ which we can guess means she was a ‘mistake’.The last point we can gather how remorseful he is because he is totally overwhelmed with grief, we see the caring fatherly side to him for the last time in the final scene when the two lovers are found dead together in the chapel. We can tell he knows the feud has been the main reason for their deaths and rightly blames himself. We know how sorry he is when he offers peace to Lord Montague and we realise he has been a loving father and husband all the way through the play, he just thinks what he is doing (i. e. feuds, arranged marriages etc.) is all for the right reasons and he feels he is doing right by his family.He finally understands that his wants and Juliet’s wants were completely different and all that she wanted was irrelevant by him at the time. We feel sympathy for him at this final point in the play because we can see how he realises everything now and it’s now too late to make up for the mistakes he has made, The only thing he can do is make peace with his rival. Lord Capulet chose his power over his family and by doing so, two young people ended up dying, making this the perfect tragedy and love story. The Depiction of Lord Capulet in Romeo & Juliet Set in the city of Verona during the 12th/13th century, Romeo and Juliet, is a typical love story by William Shakespeare with a tragedy twist. When Romeo Montague and his friends gate-crash Lord Capulet’s party, the last thing he imagined he would do is find the love of his life, Juliet. After realising Romeo is the son of her father’s sworn enemy they decide to keep their relationship secret and get married behind her families back. When Romeo’s best friend Mercutio is stabbed and killed by Juliet’s cousin Tybalt, Romeo kills Tybalt and is declared banished.Meanwhile, Juliet’s father, Lord Capulet, decides to cheer his daughter up by allowing her to marry Paris, though unknown to him, she is already married. Severely wanting to get out of this marriage and with her husband, Romeo, in a different town, Juliet seeks assistance from the priest, father Lawrence, who hands her a ‘poison’ which will mimic death for 24 hours, after her funera l she would be placed into a vault and when she awakes from her deep sleep her and Romeo would be able to run away to be together.Romeo is unaware of this plan as he is out when the messenger arrives so when his friend Balthasar learns of the death he immediately travels to tell Romeo. With Romeo thinking his love is dead he takes the risk of going back to Verona to say his final farewell to Juliet, when he arrives he is automatically spotted and the police, once Romeo had purchased poison he makes his way to the church.Soon enough, father Lawrence learns that Romeo has no idea Juliet is actually still alive. Inside the church Romeo drinks the poison which begins to kill him.. just as Juliet begins to wake, she realizes it’s too late and takes his gun to her head, Killing her instantly. Act 1 scene 1, we see several men from two families (the Capulet’s and the Montague’s) take part in a fight led by Tybalt, a Capulet and Juliet’s cousin, and Benvolio, Rom eo’s cousin and therefore a Montague.This is where we get the feel of absolute hatred between the two families. A loathing which has been passed down through generations, started between Lord Capulet, an overpowering and very controlling man and Lord Montague and equally powerful man. We are first introduced to Lord Capulet when he gets involved in a fight between Sampson, Gregory Benvolio and Tybalt. He is shown to be aggressive and confrontational because he says ‘What noise is this?Give me long sword ho! ’ as soon and he arrives. Which could indicate he doesn’t think about what he says and can be immature as well as how willing he is to get involved in the pointless feud, this is until Prince informs them ‘Once more, on pain of death, all men depart’ which implies if there is another street both Lord Capulet, Lord Montague and any other men involved will be executed, This is when Lord Capulet’s mood changes and he becomes calm.In Act 1 scene 2 Lord Capulet seems calm and willing to make peace with Lord Montague, we know this because he says ‘†¦ ‘tis not hard, I think for men so old as we to keep the peace. ’ ‘†¦ _we_ to keep the peace’ This shows he is trying to approach Lord Montague in an equal and friendly manor as he accepts there cannot be any more violent outbreaks in the streets anymore. We next see Lord Capulet in the Capulet household in the midst of a party when he is calmly talking to Paris about his daughter Juliet.Women in the Elizabethan age could refuse marriage but would be disowned by their families. In the beginning of Romeo and Juliet, Lord Capulet thinks Juliet is ‘too young’ and ‘still a stranger to the world’ . This is showing himself to be a very caring and loving father, this could be because he has no other children and could also be the reason he treats Tybalt like the son he never had. He refuses Prince the hand of hi s daughter because he doesn’t want to lose her yet, he goes on to change his mind later in the story.In the next scene Romeo Montague gatecrashes the Capulet’s party, Lord Capulet appears to be very respected by Tybalt because when Romeo is spotted and threatened by him, Lord Capulet looks at him and says â€Å"Content thee, Gentle coz, let him alone;† He goes on to say â€Å"Here in my house do him no disparagement; Therefore be patient, take no note of him; It is my will, the which if thou respect†.This is showing himself to be a fair man, treating his family and his enemy’s son the same and shows that he is clever, powerful and respected as he doesn’t want to make a scene in public and in front of his friends and family, Surprisingly Tybalt doesn’t go against his word at all, he listens and respects the wishes of his uncle. Shakespeare is showing this man to be kind and rational, we make a judgment at this stageon how he isnâ€℠¢t reacting to the fact Romeo is his the son of his arch-rival. In this scene Lord Capulet also compliments Romeo by calling him ‘A virtuous and well governed youth’ which shows how relaxed he is about the young Montague’s presence because we couldn’t imagine him complimenting an enemy in such a way. By the next point in the story, Tybalt and Mercutio are dead and we start to get an idea of what sort of a man Lord Capulet really is.In Act 3 Scene 4 he changes his mind and allows Prince to marry Juliet for a few reasons i. e. He wants her to be married and settled to a man he approves of, He wants to be proud of her, He wants her to be married to a man who has money, is generous, powerful and respected †¦ not knowing that she is already married to Romeo. After Tybalt is killed we know Juliet is devastated because she locks herself in her room, only letting Romeo in because he appears on her balcony, unbeknown to her father.We also know Tybalt’s death isn’t the only reason for her upset the other reason she is in such shock is the fact her ‘true love’, Romeo, is the reason for Tybalt’s death although her father doesn’t know , if he knew Romeo and Juliet were married she would be disowned by him and the rest of their family. Lord Capulet decides to bring the wedding forward in order to cheer her up, we know this because he says ‘She loved her kinsman Tybalt dearly’, He sees the wedding of his only child an opportunity to lift the mood after such death in the family.Unfortunately Juliet doesn’t want to marry Prince because she is in love with the now banished, Romeo. When Lady Capulet tells Juliet of her husband’s plans for her to be wed ‘early next Thursday morn’ she is surprised but refuses and tells her mother ‘When I do marry, I swear, It shall be Romeo, whom you know I hate, rather than Paris’ , We can tell from this sentence that she hasn’t told her mother of her relationship with Romeo and that her mother thinks Juliet hates Romeo for killing Tybalt.As Lord Capulet enters her room he immediately describes her body as a ‘fountain’ and says ’in one little body thou counterfeit’s a bark, a sea, a wind, For thy eyes, which I may call the sea, Do ebb and flow with tears. Thy bark thy body is, Sailing in this salt flood. Thy winds thy sighs†¦Ã¢â‚¬â„¢ Which shows us he is concerned about her and her wellbeing, showing him to be a caring father for a split-second. He is angered when he hears that she will not bemarrying Paris and disowns her straightaway, he says unforgivable things to her such as ‘Out, you green sickness, carrion! Out you baggage! You tallow face’ he also calls her a ‘Disobedient wretch’ He goes on to say ‘Get thee to church o’ Thursday, Or never after look me in the face’ , so he’s saying she either marries Pa ris or she’ll lose her father, She has to make the decision. There is a suggestion of physical violence when Lord Capulet exclaims ‘My fingers itch.’Implying he wants to hit her for disrespecting him by disagreeing with him. He reminds her of the importance of family and marrying to obtain a high status, we know this because he says ‘And having now provided A gentleman of A noble parentage, Of fair demesnes, youthful and nobly trained, stuffed as they say, with honorable parts’ he describes Paris in this way because he is trying to persuade Juliet to marry him, its as if he doesn’t want to disown her.Lord Capulet decides that she can ‘No longer house with me’ unless she marries Paris and he would rather see her beg, starve and die in the streets than live with her if she doesn’t go through with the marriage. Lord Capulet’s behavior in this scene shocks us because we are used to seeing him as a caring and loving fathe r towards Juliet and we don’t expect him to go this far when she refuses because he has seemed like a calm man in previous scenes. It’s sad to see his behavior change this dramatically towards her because a father should look out for his daughter.It’s also sad to see because it was his decision and she hasn’t had a choice in the matter at all and the feud between the Montague’s and Capulet’s was started between the two fathers so it isn’t Juliet’s fault and she should be able to see Romeo if she wants to. During the play, the language Lord Capulet uses to describe Juliet changes a lot. In the beginning of the play he describes her as ‘still a stranger to the world’ and ‘too young to marry’ which shows he is a caring father.He is looking out for his daughter and by saying she is too young to marry, he is trying to protect her from growing up too fast. His behavior towards her changes vastly when she ref uses to marry Paris possibly because he has spent time trying to protect her and now she throws it back in his face by disagreeing with him. Although Lord Capulet is unaware of the fact she is already married, she has just delayed being disowned by her father by keeping her marriage to Romeo a secret.We notice the change immediately  because one minute he’s describing her sadness and acting like he cares about her enough to be concerned about her happiness and then he change into a stubborn and, what seems like, a care-free father . We notice the change when he says ‘What is this? â€Å"Proud† and â€Å"I thank you† and â€Å"I thank you not† And yet not â€Å"proud†? Mistress minion you. ’ We don’t think he is capable of disowning his only child but he continues to call her ‘Baggage’ and ‘Green sickness’ which shows just how upset and angry he is with her.He uses harsh words by saying ‘An you b e mine, I’ll give you my friend. An you be not, Hang, beg, starve, die in the streets, For, my soul, I’ll ne’er acknowledge thee, Nor what is mine shall never do thee good’ saying he no longer will want anything to do with her if she doesn’t marry Paris and he would rather see her beg, starve and die on the streets rather than give her somewhere to live and he’ll never want anything to do with her, however if she agrees to marry Paris then he will forgive her for disagreeing and she can stay living there etc.Act 4 scene 5, When Juliet is found ‘dead’ in her bedroom , Lord Capulet appears to be grief-stricken and genuinely upset even though he had said he would disown her if she didn’t marry Paris. His sadness over rules his power in this scene as he turns to Lady Capulet and says ‘ O Heaven! O wife, Look how our daughter bleeds! ’ showing that he is so upset, he doesn’t care about how he appears to any one else. We realise he doesn’t see how he is partly responsible for her ‘death’ by forcing her into a marriage just to bring joy to himself, not in fact thinking at all about what Juliet would want.If he had realised this, we may be able to feel more sympathetic towards him as he would have probably been really upset and angry with himself which, in turn, could have saved his daughter’s life when she awoke. When she does awake to find Romeo had poisoned himself, oblivious to the fact Juliet wasn’t dead at all, she shoots herself in the head with his gun so as they can be together after all, even if that means in a different life.We notice that Lord Capulet realises the feud between the two families have been to blame for the two lovers’ deaths because he offers Lord Montague his hand and overall peace between the Montague’s and Capulet’s, Again showing the loving and caring fatherly side to himself. Throughout the entire play L ord Capulet’s mood varies between a loving, concerned father and an angry, heartless, powerful man. There are 4 main points in his behaviour.In the beginning he comes across as a powerful man when he takes part in a fight , his attitude in this scene is limited as he seems to be this man who is only interested in showing the Montague family who owns the city. When he engages in a conversation with Paris about marrying Juliet, he becomes more of a caring father and try’s to look out for her by saying she is ‘Too young’ to marry and although he says she is ‘still a stranger to him? which suggests that he has doubts about her loyalty to him and this also shows an absence of trust in her.The next main point is when he changes again to become an angry and somewhat cold man, we think this because he feels let down and his fears of loyalty towards him are true to an extent. He decides to disown her as a daughter unless she marries Paris because he feels let down and he obviously though he was doing right by her. He says he would rather see her beg and die on the streets than stay in that house, he calls her ‘baggage’ which we can guess means she was a ‘mistake’.The last point we can gather how remorseful he is because he is totally overwhelmed with grief, we see the caring fatherly side to him for the last time in the final scene when the two lovers are found dead together in the chapel. We can tell he knows the feud has been the main reason for their deaths and rightly blames himself. We know how sorry he is when he offers peace to Lord Montague and we realise he has been a loving father and husband all the way through the play, he just thinks what he is doing (i. e. feuds, arranged marriages etc.) is all for the right reasons and he feels he is doing right by his family.He finally understands that his wants and Juliet’s wants were completely different and all that she wanted was irrelevant by him at the time. We feel sympathy for him at this final point in the play because we can see how he realises everything now and it’s now too late to make up for the mistakes he has made, The only thing he can do is make peace with his rival. Lord Capulet chose his power over his family and by doing so, two young people ended up dying, making this the perfect tragedy and love story.

Newt Gingrich essays

Newt Gingrich essays All members of legislature are influential. In fact, they are some of the most influential people in the nation. However, it is obvious that certain legislators have had a greater impact on society than others. I feel that Newt Gingrich has had a greater impact in congress that any other member. When Newt was still a child, his father was a soldier. This inspired him to serve his life for the well being of his country. He knew that in order to understand how to decide how things should run in the future, he should first understand the past. He received his Bachelors degree from Emory University and a Masters and Doctorate from Tulane University in Modern European History. Before he was elected to Congress, he taught History and Environmental Studies at West Georgia College for eight years. He is known as an expert on world history, military issues, and international affairs. It took him three tries, but the West Gergia College history professor eventually got into Congress. His first run for a Georgia congressional seat was in 1974; it was a narrow loss. He then gave it another shot in 1976, and walked away with another loss. But the third times the charm. In 1978, he was finally elected into Congress as a member of the GOP. He took advantage of nationally televised coverage of congressional proceedings, and took the floor to denounce Democrats and liberalism. He encouraged to other Republicans to follow in his footsteps. This outraged the Democrats. Some people even say that he single handedly forced Speaker Jim Wrights resignation in 1989 by making attacks on the Democratic leader. Gingrich had gotten nine of the ten legislative proposals in the contract passed. His name had become popularly known among the general public. However, his fame resulted in his downfall. Gingrich had agreed to a book deal. Democrats had started attacking him just like he had attacked Jim Wright. Do...

Nature of Morals Essay Example

Nature of Morals Essay Example Nature of Morals Essay Nature of Morals Essay Essay Topic: Toulmin Metaethics negotiations about the nature of moralss and moral logical thinking. Discussions about whether moralss is comparative and whether we ever act from opportunism are illustrations of meta-ethical treatments. In fact. pulling the conceptual differentiation between Metaethics. Normative Ethics. and Applied Ethics is itself a metaethical analysis. Normative moralss is interested in finding the content of our moral behaviour. Normative ethical theories seek to supply action-guides ; processs for replying the Practical Question ( What ought I to make? ) . The moral theories of Kant and Bentham are illustrations of normative theories that seek to supply guidelines for finding a specific class of moral action. Think of the Categorical Imperative in the instance of the former and the Principle of Utility in the instance of the latter. Applied Ethics efforts to cover with specific kingdoms of human action and to craft standards for discoursing issues that might originate within those kingdoms. The modern-day field of Applied Ethics arouse in the late sixtiess and early 1970s. Today. it is a booming portion of the field of moralss. Numerous books and web-sites are devoted to subjects such as Business Ethics. Computer Ethics. and Engineering Ethical motives. Ethical Relativism Distinctions within Relativism There is a differentiation between morals and mores . The latter can be defined as harmless customs ( e. g. . tea at 4 ) ; the former as treatment of others ( e. g. . the pattern of Apartheid ) . In discoursing Relativism. we are concerned merely with moral patterns. The Problem of Relativism: What one society considers Right. another Society considers Wrong. Therefore. RIGHT AND WRONG are RELATIVE to a PARTICULAR SOCIETY. Here we need to be cognizant of two things: ( 1 ) Confusing harmless conventions ( The British thrust on the left side of the route ) with harmful practices ( Clitorectomy is customary among the Somali ) . ( 2 ) Even if moralities may differ from society to society. it need non follow that Morality Itself is comparative - for there is a farther differentiation between CULTURAL ( descriptive ) RELATIVISM and NORMATIVE ( Ethical ) RELATIVISM. Cultural ( descriptive ) Relativism: The descriptive relativist merely notes certain sociological Fact: ( a ) Factual Claims: x is considered right in Society Y at clip t and x is considered incorrect in Society omega at clip t. ( B ) Empirical Decision: Moralities are comparative [ Note that the claims of Cultural Relativism are either true or false. ] Normative ( ethical ) Relativism The normative relativist goes BEYOND any sociological facts. ( a ) Normative Claim: What is considered right in Society x at clip T IS right for that Society. ( B ) Theoretical ( metaethical ) Claim: Morality Itself is Relative. Note that ethical relativism does non logically follow from any truths uncovered by descriptive relativism. Note besides that the ethical relativist has a difficult clip explicating how extremist moral alteration can happen within a certain society ( as with bondage or women’s right to vote in the United States ) . Ethical Egoism Psychological and Ethical Egoism. As a metaethical theory of motive. psychological egoism asserts the descriptive claim that all of our actions can be reduced to opportunism: Whenever people do something. it is merely because they think something desirable for themselves will ensue from it. The claim is descriptive and therefore open to counterexamples. and it is wide. saying a reductionistic thesis sing all of our actions. ( Contrast psychological egoism with the psychological province of understanding. where the wale and suffering of the other becomes the motivation for our action’. ) Ethical egoism is a normative theory that states that our actions ought to be done from the position of opportunism. One of the jobs with this place is that it might non be in one’s opportunism to hold eveyone act from the position of opportunism. This state of nature’ would non be desirable ( in Hobbes’ footings. life would be beastly. brutal. and short ) and so it might finally be in one’s self-interest to come in into a contract with others that would put restraints upon self-interested actions. Utilitarian Theories Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory that places the venue of right and incorrect entirely on the results ( effects ) of taking one action/policy over other actions/policies. As such. it moves beyond the range of one’s ain involvements and takes into history the involvements of others. Bentham’s Utility Principle: ( 1 ) Recognizes the cardinal function of hurting and pleasance in human life. ( 2 ) approves or disapproves of an action on the footing of the sum of hurting or pleasance brought about i. e. effects. ( 3 ) equates good with pleasance and immorality with hurting. and ( 4 ) asserts that pleasance and hurting are capable of quantification ( and therefore measure’ ) . In mensurating pleasance and hurting. Bentham introduces the undermentioned standards: INTENSITY. DURATION. CERTAINTY ( or UNCERTAINTY ) . and its NEARNESS ( or FARNESS ) . He besides includes its fecundity ( will more of the same follow? ) and its purity ( its pleasance won’t be followed by hurting A ; frailty versa ) . In sing actions that affect Numberss of people. we must besides account for its EXTENT. John Stuart Mill adjusted the more hedonic inclinations in Bentham’s doctrine by stressing ( 1 ) It is non the measure of pleasance. but the quality of felicity that is cardinal to utilitarianism. ( 2 ) the concretion is unreasonable - qualities can non be quantified ( there is a differentiation between higher’ and lower’ pleasances ) . and ( 3 ) utilitarianism refers to the Greatest Happiness Principle - it seeks to advance the capableness of accomplishing felicity ( higher pleasances ) for the most sum of people ( this is its extent ) . Act and Rule Utilitarianism. We can use the rule of public-service corporation to either PARTICULAR ACTIONS or GENERAL RULES. The former is called act-utilitarianism and the latter is called rule-utilitarianism. Act-utilitarianism - The rule of public-service corporation is applied straight to each alternate act in a state of affairs of pick. The right act is so defined as the one which brings about the best consequences ( or the least sum of bad consequences ) . * Criticisms of this position point to the trouble of achieving a full cognition and surely of the effects of our actions. * It is possible to warrant immoral Acts of the Apostless utilizing AU: Suppose you could stop a regional war by tormenting kids whose male parents are enemy soliders. therefore uncovering the fell outs of the male parents. Rule-utilitarianism - The rule of public-service corporation is used to find the cogency of regulations of behavior ( moral rules ) . A regulation like promise-keeping is established by looking at the effects of a universe in which people broke promises at will and a universe in which promises were adhering. Right and incorrect are so defined as following or interrupting those regulations. * Some unfavorable judgments of this place point out that if the Rules take into history more and more exclusions. RU collapses into AU. * More genearl unfavorable judgments of this position argue that it is possible to bring forth unjust rules harmonizing to the rule of public-service corporation. For illustration. bondage in Greece might be right if it led to an overall accomplishment of cultivated felicity at the disbursal of some abused persons. Deontological Theories Acting from Duty Deontological normative ethical theories place the venue of right and incorrect in independent attachment to moral Torahs or responsibilities. Monistic deontology - Kant’s Categorical Imperative ( Act merely on that axiom whereby 1000 canst at the same clip will that it should go a cosmopolitan law ) provides the beginning of right action. Its first preparation provinces Act as if the axiom of your action were to procure through your will a cosmopolitan jurisprudence of nature ; its 2nd preparation provinces Always act so as to handle humanity. whether in your ain individual or that of another. as an terminal in itself. neer as a means merely. Actions that conform to these jussive moods ( i. e. . right actions ) and are. moreover. done from a sense of responsibility. are the prototype of morally applaudable actions. Critics of Kant’s attack claim that his Categorical Imperative does non incorporate within it a manner to decide struggles of responsibilities. Lying is wrong can be interpreted as Never lie and therefore Universal Principles can harden’ into Absolute Principles. Pluralistic deontology - For the twentieth Century philosopher W. D. Ross. there are a figure of responsibilities that contemplation reveals - and these organize a group of leading facie duties. The phrase prima facie ( all things being equal’ ) refers to the fact that these responsibilities do non adhere us perfectly. but instead that they by and large hold - absent any farther considerations. Two cardinal responsibilities are nonmaleficence ( don’t injury others ) and beneficence ( assist others ) . Other leading facie responsibilities include don’t prevarication. ’ don’t putting to death. ’ keep promises. ’ etc. When conflicts occur between responsibilities. our existent responsibility becomes that which intuitive judgment discerns as the right thing to make ( e. g. . lying to salvage the life of an guiltless individual ) . Critics are cautious about mentioning to intuition’ as the standard for finding our existent class of action. Stephen Toulmin suggested that we weigh up. every bit good as we can. the hazards involved in disregarding either. and take the lesser of two evils’ . Thus. while the rules may be deontic in nature. a declaration of struggles of rules could appeal to likely effects. Virtue Ethics Historical Perspective There is a long tradition in moralss that places great importance on the kind of individual one is. We non merely want those around us to tell the truth ( for illustration. harmonizing to the Categorical Imperative ) . but besides to be honest. Both Aristotle ( arete ) and Aquinas ( vertu ) emphasized this facet of moralss by foregrounding the function of what we would today name character in their treatments of moralss ( and the authoritative virtuousnesss of bravery. justness. and moderateness ) . David Hume besides gave virtuousness and personal virtue a cardinal function in his ethical theory. The recent resurgence of involvement in virtuousness moralss can be traced back to Philippa Foot. She writes that a person’s virtue may be judged by his innermost desires every bit good as by his purposes ; and this fits with our thought that a virtuousness such as generousness lies every bit much in someone’s attitudes as in his actions . The Moral Concept of Virtue We should separate the virtuousnesss found in a peculiar society or civilization ( e. g. . celibacy ) from those virtuousnesss that can be supported by moral logical thinking ( e. g. . honestness ) . A virtuousness is a trait of character that is socially valued. and a moral virtuousness is a trait that is morally valued†¦Moral grounds must back up a claim†¦of moral virtue . By stressing the precedence of character in treatments of moralss. virtuousness theoreticians can state: †¦rather than utilizing regulations and authorities ordinances to protect topics in research. some claim that the most dependable protection is the presence of an informed. painstaking. compassionate. responsible researcher’ . The implicit in position here is that character is more of import than conformance to regulations and that virtuousnesss should be inculcated and cultivated over clip through educational interactions. function theoretical accounts. etc. A practical effect of this position is that the instruction of. for illustration medical physicians. should include the cultivation of virtuousnesss such as compassion. understanding. trustiness. unity. conscientiousness every bit good as benevolence ( desire to assist ) and nonmalevolence ( desire to avoid injury ) . Critical Evaluation of Virtue Ethics Often times we encounter morality between strangers ( as when one enters an Emergency Room after a auto accident ) . At these times. it’s non the person’s character. but his/her demand to follow regulations and processs that seem to come to the head ( Virtue is non enough ) . Furthermore. individuals of good character’ can surely explicate bad policy’ or do a poor choice’ - and we need to measure those policies and picks harmonizing to moral rules. Constructive Evaluation of Virtue Ethics Yet †¦ethical theory is more complete if the virtuousnesss are included†¦motives merit to be at halfway phase in a manner that some taking traditional theories have inadequately appreciated †¦ To expression at Acts of the Apostless without besides looking at the moral rightness and desirableness of feelings. attitudes. signifiers of understanding. and the similar is to lose a big country of the moral picture ( B A ; C. 4th Ed. . 69 ) Broad Rights and Communitarian Theories Today we frequently find moral jobs framed by positions derived from political doctrine. Issues like mercy killing. root cell research and abortion every bit good as distributive justness concerns such as societal security and Medicare. are likely to be seen along the liberal/conservative divide. Traditional moral theories need to take these models into consideration. Will Kymlicka’s Introduction to Political Philosophy provides analyses of the philosophical thoughts behind the ideological debates that now envelop many subjects in moral doctrine. Of peculiar value is his treatment of broad equality. libertarianism. and communitarianism. Broad equality is frequently associated with the work on John Rawls in his Theory of Justice. It argues that we should rationally confirm two cardinal rules of justness designed to protect our political autonomies and societal chances. It can be straight contrasted with the libertarian thoughts found in Robert Nozick’s Anarchy. State. and Utopia. Nozick challenges Rawls’s attack to societal inequalities and argues for a minimalist province. But both writers ( and their followings ) conceive of persons as Socratic’ in nature. capable of concluding about their life program and oppugning. in rule. the universe around them. In this sense. they are both liberals’ in the tradition of John Stuart Mill’s essay. On Liberty. For progressives. the inquiry about the good life requires us to do a judgement about what kind of a individual we wish to be . Thus progressives will stress the function of pick and freedom from authorities intervention in private affairs. For communitarians. on the other manus. persons are non atomistic. unencumbered selves’ - persons are situated within a community. embedded in the standard wisdom of our human civilization. Communal values are authoritative horizons’ wherein we take our orientation toward life. The self is non anterior to. but instead constituted by. its terminals - we can non separate me’ from my ends’ [ and ] our egos are at least partially constituted by terminals that we do non take. but instead discover by virtuousness of our being embedded in some shared societal context . Since self-government does non happen in a vacuity. the authorities needs to back up a societal environment that is contributing to the development of what is best in all of us. For those communitarians who are social conservativists. ’ this will frequently take the signifier of a publicity family values’ that can. for illustration. discourage alterations in the establishment of matrimony. Broadly talking. these two places account for the divide between liberals’ and social conservatives’ in covering with affairs such as abortion and mercy killing. In these state of affairss. progressives tend to go pro-choice’ and societal conservativists tend to go pro-life. ***** As is to be expected in a modern. pluralistic democracy. many of these issues are addressed in the political kingdom and through the political procedure ( including the tribunals ) . But the sorts of cases’ that arise within these countries should besides be addressed within the model of applied moralss as a manner to acquire clearer about the nature of the job and its potency for declaration. Indeed. we frequently see analyses found in applied moralss. such as the construct of a person in the morally important sense’ or the differentiation between killing’ and allowing to decease. ’ embedded in the political argument itself. Ethical motives of Care In the 1970s and 80s feminist authors began to oppugn the premises behind many of the traditional ethical theories. Carol Gilligan’s work in moral psychological science challenged justice-based attacks to moral treatment: †¦ work forces tend to encompass an moral principle of rights utilizing quasi-legal nomenclature and impartial rules †¦ adult females tend to confirm an moral principle of attention that centers on reactivity in an interrelated web of demands. attention. and bar of injury. Taking attention of others is the nucleus impression. Annette Baier’s philosophical history of an moralss of attention does non urge that we discard classs of duty. but that we make room for an moral principle of love and trust. including an history of human bonding and friendly relationship. In both of these histories. there is a specific unfavorable judgment of Traditional Liberal Theory and its accent on nonpartisanship and catholicity: The nonpartisanship and the standpoint of degage fairness’ advocated by broad theories of justness. overlook. for illustration. the moral function of fond regard to those close to us. Talking from the position of medical moralss. The attention position is particularly meaningful for functions such as parent. friend. doctor. and nurse. in which contextual response. heed to subtle hints. and the deepening of particular relationships are likely to be more momentous morally than impartial treatment In jointing the challenge to universal rules. Beauchamp and Childress write: We can bring forth unsmooth generalisations about how caring doctors and nurses respond to patients. for illustration. but these generalisations will non be elusive plenty to give helpful counsel for the following patient. Each state of affairs calls for a set of responses outside any generalization†¦ . Advocates of an Ethical motives of Care stress the functions of Mutual Interdependence and Emotional Response that play an of import portion in our moral lives: †¦many human relationships involve individuals who are vulnerable. dependant. ill. and frail †¦ [ and ] the desirable moral response is affiliated heed to demands. non degage regard for rights ( B A ; C. 373 ) and The individual who acts from lawful duties without suitably aligned feelings such as concern when a friend suffers seems to hold a moral lack. In addition†¦insight into the demands of others and considerate watchfulness to their fortunes frequently come from the emotions more than ground. Therefore the emotions seem to hold a cognitive function. ’ leting us to hold on a state of affairs that may non be instantly available to one reasoning entirely from a justice position. ’ Critical Evaluation of the Care Ethic The illustration of a nurse who personally wants to assist a patient dice. but who will non make so as it violates professional responsibility. shows that †¦the moralss of attention must face state of affairss in which bona fide demands of nonpartisanship struggle with moving partly from attention. Some womens rightists really interpret the care ethic’ as culturally determined by the male hierarchy. For illustration. a terminally sick expansive female parent may bespeak to be allowed to decease because she doesn’t want to be a bother’ to her household. Here person like Susan Sherwin sees a demand to analyze the societal context of attention every bit good as to set up bounds to the moralss of attention. Both endeavors would affect entreaties to justice†¦ Constructive Evaluation of the Care Ethic Sensitivity and emotional response to peculiar state of affairss ( like household treatments with doctors ) provide of import ushers to morally acceptable actions. A attention moral principle besides seems to prefer following processs from Conflict Resolution and Dispute Mediation as alternate ways to near an evident ethical struggle. Hedonism The term hedonism. from the Grecian word ( hedone ) for pleasance. refers to several related theories about what is good for us. how we should act. and what motivates us to act in the manner that we do. All hedonic theories identify pleasance and hurting as the lone of import elements of whatever phenomena they are designed to depict. If hedonic theories identified pleasance and hurting as simply two of import elements. alternatively of the lone of import elements of what they are depicting. so they would name it Hedonism uld non be about every bit unpopular as they all are. However. the claim that pleasance and hurting are the lone things of ultimate importance is what makes hedonism typical and philosophically interesting. Philosophic pagans tend to concentrate on hedonic theories of value. and particularly of wellbeing ( the good life for the one life it ) . As a theory of value. hedonism states that all and lone pleasance is per se valuable and all and merely hurting is per se non valuable. Hedonists normally define pleasance and hurting loosely. such that both physical and mental phenomena are included. Thus. a soft massage and remembering a fond memory are both considered to do pleasance and stubbing a toe and hearing about the decease of a loved one are both considered to do hurting. With pleasance and hurting so defined. hedonism as a theory about what is valuable for us is intuitively appealing. Indeed. its entreaty is evidenced by the fact that about all historical and modern-day interventions of well-being allocate at least some infinite for treatment of hedonism. Unfortunately for hedonism. the treatments seldom endorse it and some even deplore its focal point on pleasance. This article begins by clear uping the different types of hedonic theories and the labels they are frequently given. Then. hedonism’s ancient beginnings and its subsequent development are reviewed. The bulk of this article is concerned with depicting the of import theoretical divisions within Prudential Hedonism and discoursing the major unfavorable judgments of these attacks. The Origins of Hedonism. a. Aristippus and the Cyrenaics The Cyrenaics. founded by Artistippus were besides skeptics and Hedonic Egotists. Although the dearth of original texts makes it hard to confidently province all of the justifications for the Cyrenaics’ places. their overall stance is clear plenty. The Cyrenaics believed pleasance was the ultimate good and everyone should prosecute all immediate pleasances for themselves. They considered bodily pleasures better than mental pleasances. presumptively because they were more graphic or trusty. The Cyrenaics besides recommended prosecuting immediate pleasances and avoiding immediate strivings with light or no respect for future effects. Their logical thinking for this is even less clear. but is most credibly linked to their doubting positions – possibly that what we can be most certain of in this unsure being is our current bodily pleasances. B. Epicurus Epicurus laminitis of Epicureanism. developed a Normative Hedonism in blunt contrast to that of Aristippus. The Epicureanism of Epicurus is besides rather the antonym to the common use of Epicureanism ; while we might wish to travel on a epicurean Epicurean vacation packed with all right dining and reasonably inordinate wining. Epicurus would warn us that we are merely puting ourselves up for future hurting. For Epicurus. felicity was the complete absence of bodily and particularly mental strivings. including fright of the Gods and desires for anything other than the au naturel necessities of life. Even with merely the limited surpluss of ancient Greece on offer. Epicurus advised his followings to avoid towns. and particularly market places. in order to restrict the resulting desires for unneeded things. Once we experience unneeded pleasances. such as those from sex and rich nutrient. we will so endure from painful and difficult to fulfill desires for more and better of the same. No affair how affluent we might be. Epicurus would reason. our desires will finally surpass our agencies and interfere with our ability to populate tranquil. happy lives. Epicureanism is by and large egocentric. in that it encourages everyone to prosecute felicity for themselves. However. Epicureans would be improbable to perpetrate any of the selfish Acts of the Apostless we might anticipate from other egotists because Epicureans train themselves to want merely the really rudimentss. which gives them really small ground to make anything to interfere with the personal businesss of others. c. The Oyster Example With the exclusion of a brief period discussed below. Hedonism has been by and large unpopular of all time since its ancient beginnings. Although unfavorable judgments of the ancient signifiers of hedonism were many and varied. one in specific was to a great extent cited. In Philebus. Plato’s Socrates and one of his many foils. Protarchus in this case. are discoursing the function of pleasance in the good life. Socrates asks Protarchus to conceive of a life without much pleasance but full of the higher cognitive procedures. such as cognition. premeditation and consciousness and to compare it with a life that is the antonym. Socrates describes this opposite life as holding perfect pleasance but the mental life of an oyster. indicating out that the topic of such a life would non be able to appreciate any of the pleasance within it. The disking idea of populating the enjoyable but unreflective life of an oyster causes Protarchus to abandon his hedonic statement. The oyster illustration is now easy avoided by clear uping that pleasance is best understood as being a witting experience. so any esthesis that we are non consciously cognizant of can non be pleasance.